HOME

Videos

Construction Update

 Latest News

 

Bob Cooper Speaks

School Board

Administrators

MEET THE BAUMANN SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS

Teachers

STUDENTS

Curriculum

Outrageous salaries

Past  Elections

Phil Christe

 SATAN TRIAL

SCHOOLS

BHES

BVES

FOX LANE HIGH SCHOOL

FLMS

MKES

PRES

SCANDALS

The Public Schools of Westchester County New York

 

072100Board member goes to school: a personal diary

BY JOSEPH WHELAN 07-21-2000

 

Early this month, as a new school board trustee, I swore to uphold the New York state Constitution as well as the Constitution of the United States. I had obtained a copy of the New York state Constitution years ago and refreshed my recollection of it prior to the swearing‑in. I was surprised to learn that our state Constitution and Bill of Rights predated and partially impacted the ideas in the United States. Constitution and Bill of Rights. It was now time to get on with the responsibilities of being a trustee.

 

It is often said that competence is attained only with three ingredients ‑ visualized as a three‑legged stool: education; training (practice, with feedback from an expert); and experience.

 

To enhance the education component, I attended the Academy for New and Senior School Board Members, a conference held in Albany from July 14 to 16. The academy was designed as a kind of boot camp to introduce new members to the duties of their new offices, and, in the case of experienced school board members, to reinforce or review their understanding of their duties. There were approximately 90 new trustees and 90 seasoned trustees that attended the academy, which was sponsored by the New York State School Boards Association (NYSSBA).

 

I had questions about whether these three days would return a result equal to the investment of time. Would the information be of continuing value? Would it contain any biases? Could NYSSBA address the needs of all 700‑plus boards of education in New York State? Would the information overload my circuits or be weighed down by statutory language? Would it be too basic or lose sight of the big picture? Would the presenters be experts as well as good presenters? Would this be another painful lecture marathon?

 

The academy exceeded all of my expectations. On Saturday afternoon, I briefly spoke with Richard Mills, state education commissioner, whom I had met when he spoke at Fox Lane High School. He asked about how the academy was; I was happy to tell him that it was excellent.

 

In the sessions for the rookies, trustees focused on how to have effective meetings, boards' legal responsibilities, communicating with the community and how school districts are funded (federal income tax, New York state income tax, property tax, sales tax, county tax). In the plenary sessions, newly‑elected board members participated with seasoned school board members to learn about educational leadership and teamwork. They also reviewed state academic, special education, vocational education and health and safety standards. They discovered different approaches to problem solving and the art of taking advantage of an opportunity.

 

The comments by Edward L. McCormick, NYSSBA president, had the clear and unmistakable tone of a visionary leader. Have a long-range plan, communicate it to all segments of the community, and consider the budgetary and tax implications of the plan, he told us. Set high standards, stick to them, monitor them to be sure that they are as expected; take steps to make sure that all students have the opportunity to grow, that all teachers have the resources they need to do the job; and support the superintendent and administration in their quest to effectively educate the students, he said. He congratulated those who left their positions as trustees, thanking them for their service and assuring all that "New York education is on the‑ right path and you helped get it there."

 

Two areas that were particularly powerful were how to have better meetings and identifying the dimensions of leadership (deciding, thinking, teaming, benchmarking and best practices).

 

Having visited these topics before, I thought, "What more could be said?" I was reminded of the National Safety Council Course I took in defensive driving, when I showed up with only a three‑by‑five card for notes. I imagined that with years of driving experience with cars, taxicabs and motorcycles, I knew the subject. I was wrong, and left the driving course with dozens of new safety tips.

 

At the school board workshop, the first topic, how to have better meetings, was masterfully presented. No boring lecture, it was a workshop that began with a video vignette of a board whose meetings were so bogged down that actions were not being taken effectively or efficiently. In a handout, NYSSBA proposed alternative steps to take, and a skillful moderator elicited responses from the rookies and those who had been around for years. Although wellintentioned, the trustees in the vignette were not being effective. They couldn't "see" how they were unintentionally weakening their effectiveness and ultimately disserving the public, by not putting into practice some basic principles. Some examples of the missteps were addressing more than one question at a time; not following the agenda; interrupting someone who was speaking; accusing a member of some transgression or motive instead of addressing the member's idea; not respecting another member's right to have a point of view; getting personal; not keeping emotions in check; not respecting the chair's role of maintaining focus on the question; and letting each member have a' chance speak rather than having a single individual speak numerous times.

 

There was some debate and discussion about how to get the board back on track. It was agreed that courtesy and consideration of people's feelings must be principal ingredients in any action taken to strengthen the board.

 

In a particularly stimulating and insightful session, Hugh D. Clark of NYSSBA held the attention of the attendees for several hours with his workshop "Dimensions of Leadership." Mr. Clark obviously had "been there." He knew the ins and outs of his topic, learned in various positions of responsibility in organizations outside of the education establishment. He addressed



            'Skills of broad value ‑ how to be a better leader, make a better decision, work as part of a team, think effectively and implement benchmarking.

 

Utilizing almost 50 visual aids, Mr. Clark, in a Socratic fashion, drew upon the knowledge of the trustees in constructing the principles of leadership. As an intellectual challenge, he began with conceptual paradoxes that leaders must understand (from Association Management‑June 2000, Paul D. Houston):

 

‑ Interdependent autonomy,

 

-Absolute integrity flexibly applied;

 

‑ Confident humility;

 

‑ Cautious risk taking;

 

-Bifocal vision (long term and short term);

 

-Variable steadiness;

 

• Skeptical beliefs;

 

• Thick‑skinned empathy‑,

 

• Lowly aloofness; and

 

• Childlike maturity

 

The fundamental paradox is the leader who must be prepared to be a servant.,

 

The dynamics that come into play when a team (board) is making a decision were highlighted, and included having all members on the same page with a clear, often written definition of what is being decided.

 

Key elements for successful decision making included deciding only after adequate information has been gathered; avoiding having a high‑stress issue prompt a quick decision; avoiding stating a position prematurely; deliberating as a board away from interruptions/influence of outside groups; and considering ethics, precedents, short‑ and long‑term implications, trends, consistency, et al.

 

As humans, we work and play differently, and as a basic Myers‑Briggs personality test will illustrate, see the world through different filters. On a similar note, Peter Drucker, the management guru, was quoted as saying, "Working with people is difficult, but not impossible."

 

Some time was devoted to effective thinking and feeling skills, with emphasis on recognizing assumptions that can derail the most perfect inductive/deductive reasoning or logic and bring one to an erroneous conclusion; visiting whether the facts are all facts or perhaps are selectively chosen that constitute a half‑true picture; determining whether there are biases present in data; honestly visiting one's own objectivity and checking possible (unintentional) biases; and keeping track of feelings and distinguishing them from beliefs.

 

Board members must be proactive to determine what is working well for other districts, so that they can benefit from other's experiences. Looking at others is also a catalyst for understanding one's own district, In addition, other industries have practices that can work well in the education industry.

 

A final topic in the morning session addressed the idea that great decisions can become bad decisions if implementation is not monitored and verified. Good policy without execution is probably worse than bad policy. As policies are crafted and adopted, the mechanism for verifying their implementation should be built into the policy. (Policies are, under New York state statutes, laws. When passing policies, trustees are acting as legislators and need to understand the implications of what they are legislating.)

 

On the drive home from Albany, I wondered whether all of these principles would be put to good use. I guess it depends on each of us as a trustee and all of us as a board whether the public will get their money's worth.

 

Joseph Whelan of Bedford Village began a three‑term as a member of the board of the Bedford Central School District earlier this month.